Council of Councils
Think Global Health
Online Store
Introduction
Over the last several decades, governments have collectively pledged to slow global warming. But despite intensified diplomacy, the world is already facing the consequences of climate…
2015 Conflict Prevention Priorities: Three Things to Know
December 19, 2014 1:17 pm (EST)
- Explainer Video
Each year, CFR’s Center for Preventive Action asks hundreds of foreign policy experts to rank the conflicts they feel might escalate next year and harm the interests of the United States. Paul Stares, the center’s director, highlights three things to keep an eye on in "what promises to be another challenging and deadly year:"
More From Our Experts
Iraq and Afghanistan: A spiraling conflict in Iraq, where ISIS is attempting to expand its foothold, or in Afghanistan, where an increasingly violent Taliban insurgency looms, could embroil the U.S. military in costly counteroffensives, warns Stares.
Major Power Rivalries: Disputes in Ukraine and the East and South China Seas could increase friction between the United States, Russia, and China, impairing their ability to cooperate on several important issues, Stares says.
Nuclear Ambitions: The nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea could ensnare those regions in conflict, Stares says. A breakdown in international talks with Tehran over its controversial program could prompt military strikes against Iran. Meanwhile, without limits on North Korea’s program, the Kim Jong-un regime could amass twenty nuclear warheads by 2016.
More From Our Experts
Top Stories on CFR
Organized crime’s hold on local governments fuels record election violence; Europe’s cocaine pipeline shifting to the Southern Cone.
John Barrientos, a captain in the U.S. Navy and a visiting military fellow at CFR, and Kristen Thompson, a colonel in the U.S. Air Force and a visiting military fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to provide an inside view on how the U.S. military is adapting to the challenges it faces.
The Myanmar army is experiencing a rapid rise in defections and military losses, posing questions about the continued viability of the junta’s grip on power.