U.S.-ASEAN-ROK Cooperation on Nontraditional Security

ASEAN and South Korean leaders join hands during a family photo before the 19th ASEAN Republic of Korea Summit in Manila, the Philippines, on November 13, 2017. Aaron Favila/Reuters

For the United States, South Korea, and ASEAN, managing nontraditional security threats such as natural disasters should be as important as coping with traditional security threats.

December 8, 2017

ASEAN and South Korean leaders join hands during a family photo before the 19th ASEAN Republic of Korea Summit in Manila, the Philippines, on November 13, 2017. Aaron Favila/Reuters
Report

Overview

Traditional security issues in the Asia-Pacific, such as tensions on the Korean Peninsula or disputes over the South China Sea, consistently attract the attention of policymakers within the region and abroad. But their consequences for ordinary people are often dwarfed by the fallout from nontraditional security (NTS) events, such as climate change, resource scarcity, infectious diseases, natural disasters, irregular migration, famine, people smuggling, drug trafficking, and transnational crime.

For countries in ASEAN, the human and economic losses from NTS threats can be staggering.

For countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the human and economic losses from NTS threats can be staggering. Moreover, economic and social costs from NTS threats consume resources that otherwise could be channeled toward economic growth and social welfare. Historically, there have been bilateral and multilateral attempts at cooperation on NTS in the Asia-Pacific, but they have not been enough.

Jaehyon Lee

Senior Fellow, ASEAN and Oceania Studies Program, Asan Institute for Policy Studies

Trilateral cooperation among the United States, ASEAN, and South Korea would benefit not just the participating parties, but also the region as a whole. Such cooperation would allow South Korea to contribute to the region and is consistent with the Moon Jae-in government’s desire to play a greater foreign policy role beyond the Korean Peninsula. It would also advance the U.S.-South Korean alliance and give South Korea experience that could be used in future NTS crises in North Korea such as famines, natural disasters, or pandemics.

More on:

Humanitarian Intervention

Diplomacy and International Institutions

Southeast Asia

South Korea

United States

To do so, the United States, ASEAN, and South Korea should start by focusing on humanitarian assistance and disaster relief and transnational crime. This cooperation could lead to progress on issues such as environmental protection, climate change, and public health.

More on:

Humanitarian Intervention

Diplomacy and International Institutions

Southeast Asia

South Korea

United States

Top Stories on CFR

India

The election date for the world’s largest democracy is set to begin April 19 and last six weeks. What would the results of a third term for Prime Minister Modi mean for India’s economy, democracy, and position in the Global South? 

RealEcon

The response to the temporary closure of the Port of Baltimore—from a deadly tanker collision—demonstrates the resilience of U.S. supply chains despite fears of costly disruptions.

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

Violence around U.S. elections in 2024 could not only destabilize American democracy but also embolden autocrats across the world. Jacob Ware recommends that political leaders take steps to shore up civic trust and remove the opportunity for violence ahead of the 2024 election season.