from Asia Program

Stabilizing the U.S.-Korea Trade Agenda Under Trump and Moon

Hanjin Shipping's container terminal is seen at the Busan New Port, in Busan, South Korea, on August 8, 2013. Lee Jae-Won/ Reuters

Uncertainty in the U.S.-South Korea economic partnership could hinder security cooperation if left unchecked. The two countries should explore collaboration in AI technologies, policy coordination in the Indo-Pacific, and economic cooperation with North Korea.

February 26, 2020

Hanjin Shipping's container terminal is seen at the Busan New Port, in Busan, South Korea, on August 8, 2013. Lee Jae-Won/ Reuters
Report

Overview

The Donald J. Trump administration’s focus on “fair and reciprocal trade” has serious implications for the U.S.-South Korea economic relationship. Despite relative satisfaction with the status quo in the two business communities, the economic relationship has received political attention at the highest levels. Careful management, including the cultivation of new areas of cooperation, is needed to prevent economic issues from hindering close security cooperation on North Korea policy and to put the overall relationship on more solid footing.

Tami Overby

Senior Director, McLarty Associates

Scott A. Snyder
Scott A. Snyder

Senior Fellow for Korea Studies and Director of the Program on U.S.-Korea Policy

Troy Stangarone

Senior Director, Korea Economic Institute

Ellen Swicord

Research Associate, Korea Studies

Since the ratification of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA), U.S.-South Korea economic cooperation has emerged as a pillar of their alliance. South Korea has expanded its exports through free trade agreements with China, Southeast Asian countries, and the European Union, enhancing its value to the United States as an economic partner by broadening its economic options and increasing international competition for a share of its markets. But ongoing U.S.-China competition has put pressure on the U.S.-South Korea economic relationship and pushed South Korea to choose between its security guarantor and its primary economic partner.

More on:

South Korea

International Economics

Trade

Trump in Asia

Moon Jae-in

Negotiations that resulted in revised U.S.-South Korea trade arrangements have temporarily lessened tension in the relationship. In early 2018, at the Trump administration’s insistence, the two sides agreed on relatively small modifications to the KORUS FTA. The economic relationship will require further attention as South Korea addresses its vulnerability to fallout from the U.S.-China trade war and adjusts to China’s growing economic power. South Korea will also have to maneuver within the new trade environment resulting from the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). Although South Korea could be interested in joining the CPTPP, the recent decline in relations with Japan, a founding member of CPTPP, complicates that prospect.

Using the revised KORUS FTA as a platform for future cooperation, the United States and South Korea should work to expand their partnership to include economic cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, energy security, and plans for inter-Korean economic initiatives. They should also address unfair trading practices, the challenges aging societies face, and fourth-industrial-revolution issues.

The Council on Foreign Relations U.S.-Korea Policy program is supported in part by generous grants from the Smith Richardson Foundation and the Korea Foundation.

More on:

South Korea

International Economics

Trade

Trump in Asia

Moon Jae-in

Top Stories on CFR

Indonesia

Prabowo Subianto was named the winner of the Indonesian presidential election. But it is unclear which version of Prabowo—the more moderate candidate from the campaign trail or the self-styled strongman—will govern Indonesia.

Russia

The mass casualty theater attack in Moscow was a reminder that affiliates of the Islamic State have reorganized and infiltrated even powerful states.

India

With India's development continuing to gain steam, one of the biggest challenges will be to avoid the mistake that others have made when they failed to recognize their newly acquired global systemic influence and adapt accordingly. Both China and Big Tech show that it is never too early to start managing one's own rise.