from Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy Program

Entrepreneurship in Postconflict Zones

May 14, 2012

Report

More on:

Development

Gender

Peacekeeping

Overview

Economic development is a critical component of promoting stability and U.S. security interests, particularly in conflict and postconflict zones. Around the world, entrepreneurs who own small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) drive economic growth and jobs creation. Yet, when trying to expand and grow their businesses, SMEs—especially those owned by women—face several challenges in accessing capital, markets, networks, and business skills trainings. Often, nonprofit organizations, corporations, governments, and international institutions working on these issues address these barriers in silos. In this Working Paper, CFR Fellow Gayle Tzemach Lemmon argues for comprehensive, long-term, collaborative approaches to help entrepreneurs in conflict and postconflict countries overcome these challenges. Greater efforts should be made to share information regarding best practices and lessons learned among all parties working on SME development in fragile states, and solutions that appear to be working should be scaled up, such as business matchmaking services and financial products now in pilot stages (i.e., funds specifically reserved for SME lending). For those promoting peace, stability, and prosperity, supporting entrepreneurship should be a vital component of any reconstruction effort.

More on:

Development

Gender

Peacekeeping

Top Stories on CFR

Indonesia

Prabowo Subianto was named the winner of the Indonesian presidential election. But it is unclear which version of Prabowo—the more moderate candidate from the campaign trail or the self-styled strongman—will govern Indonesia.

Russia

The mass casualty theater attack in Moscow was a reminder that affiliates of the Islamic State have reorganized and infiltrated even powerful states.

India

With India's development continuing to gain steam, one of the biggest challenges will be to avoid the mistake that others have made when they failed to recognize their newly acquired global systemic influence and adapt accordingly. Both China and Big Tech show that it is never too early to start managing one's own rise.